Search for: All records

Abstract. Root-zone water storage capacity (Sr) – the maximum water volume available for vegetation uptake – bolsters ecosystem resilience to droughts and heatwaves, influences land–atmosphere exchange, and controls runoff and groundwater recharge. In land models, Sr serves as a critical parameter to simulate water availability for vegetation and its impact on processes like transpiration and soil moisture dynamics. However, Sr is difficult to measure, especially at large spatial scales, hindering an accurate understanding of many biophysical processes, such as photosynthesis, evapotranspiration, tree mortality, and wildfire risk. Here, we present a global estimate of Sr using measurements of total water storage (TWS) anomalies from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On satellite missions. We find that the median Sr value for global vegetated regions is at least 220±40 mm, which is over 50 % larger than the latest estimate derived from tracking storage change via water fluxes and 380 % larger than that calculated using a typical soil and rooting-depth parameterization. These findings reveal that plant-available water stores exceed the storage capacity of 2 m deep soil in nearly half of Earth's vegetated surface, representing a notably larger extent than previous estimates. Applying our Sr estimates in a global hydrological model improves evapotranspiration simulations compared to other Sr estimates across much of the globe, particularly during droughts, highlighting the robustness of our approach. Our study highlights the importance of continued refinement and validation of Sr estimates and provides a new observational approach for further exploring the impacts of Sr on water resource management and ecosystem sustainability. 

Abstract Spatiotemporal patterns of plant water uptake, loss, and storage exert a first‐order control on photosynthesis and evapotranspiration. Many studies of plant responses to water stress have focused on differences between species because of their different stomatal closure, xylem conductance, and root traits. However, several other ecohydrological factors are also relevant, including soil hydraulics, topographically driven redistribution of water, plant adaptation to local climatic variations, and changes in vegetation density. Here, we seek to understand the relative importance of the dominant species for regional‐scale variations in woody plant responses to water stress. We map plant water sensitivity (PWS) based on the response of remotely sensed live fuel moisture content to variations in hydrometeorology using an auto‐regressive model. Live fuel moisture content dynamics are informative of PWS because they directly reflect vegetation water content and therefore patterns of plant water uptake and evapotranspiration. The PWS is studied using 21,455 wooded locations containing U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis plots across the western United States, where species cover is known and where a single species is locally dominant. Using a species‐specific mean PWS value explains 23% of observed PWS variability. By contrast, a random forest driven by mean vegetation density, mean climate, soil properties, and topographic descriptors explains 43% of observed PWS variability. Thus, the dominant species explains only 53% (23% compared to 43%) of explainable variations in PWS. Mean climate and mean NDVI also exert significant influence on PWS. Our results suggest that studies of differences between species should explicitly consider the environments (climate, soil, topography) in which observations for each species are made, and whether those environments are representative of the entire species range.